• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Skip to footer navigation

  • Calendar of events
  • 687 Larch Av, Teaneck NJ
  • 201-836-5187
  • Contact Us
  • DONATE
Ethical Culture Society of Bergen County NJ

Ethical Culture Society of Bergen County NJ

  • Home
  • About
    • Platform
    • FAQ
      • How does Ethical Culture make a difference in society?
      • What social life is there in Ethical Culture?
      • How is Ethical Culture religious?
    • Ethical Brew
    • Ceremonies
    • Philosophy
    • Constitution & Bylaws
    • Contact Us
  • Ethical Kids
    • Sunday School
      • Primary Class
      • Elementary Class
      • Junior Class
      • Senior Class
      • Sunday school FAQ
    • Youth Group
  • Leader
    • Leader Curt Collier
    • Leader’s Talks
    • Joe Chuman, Retired Leader
      • Talks by Dr Joseph Chuman
      • Speaking of Ethics: Living a Humanist Life
      • Wedding Officiant
  • Social Action
    • All Social Action Articles
    • Battling Racism
    • Environmental Action
    • Healthcare
  • Adult Ed
    • Job Club
    • Socrates Cafe
    • Ethical Culture Review of Books
  • News
    • President Column
    • UN Report
    • Platform Addresses
  • Events

Is Doing the Greatest Good for the Greatest Number the Right Thing?

April 12, 2012

A frosty but warm-hearted group gathered and decided to discuss if utilitarianism made sense. We began with a simple formulation of that ethical view, as mentioned in the title, but recognized that it could also be stated as doing the least harm or trying to do things that maximize the happiness or best consequences for those affected by one’s acts.
One of the first questions that arose was: who is in a position to make the decision of what is good or what happiness results from one’s actions? Even if one is trying to minimize suffering, rather than maximizing happiness, how can anyone be confident that he or she understand the variety of values and attitudes that others hold. While we may believe that pain and suffering should always be minimized, some belief such tribulations have redemptive value and would not want to avoid them.
The very idea of defining what is good for anyone else seems quite paternalistic. Like the Golden Rule, it assumes that what we would want for ourselves is a valid measuring stick to judge what we should do for others. Clearly this may not always be correct. We noted that Ethical Culture’s notion of identifying that which is special and worthy of development in others and thereby fostering our own moral development seems to avoid this paternalism.
Goods come in different flavors. Unconditional goods are those which one cannot have too much of, like health and justice. Most goods are conditional (e.g. money, relaxation, and freedom). But doing everything to maximize health of a society nonetheless will compromise other needs, and this too is not a realistic or even desirable goal.
We were concerned that utilitarianism seems to place values on people and would be willing to sacrifice handicapped newborns, since they would be a drain on social resources that could be put to alternative uses. Such a calculus seems to be operating in countries with national health systems, e.g. Britain, in which there is an age limit on providing dialysis machines. While this may be a reasonable, logical and “cost-effective” policy, it seems to run counter to our belief in the basic value and dignity of all humans, regardless of their age, physical and mental condition, or their capacity for productively contributing to society. Policy makers need to make disinterested decisions, but we, as family members, usually cannot. The cold, calculating aspect of utilitarianism seems to need an assertive counter-force to express compassion and respect for individuals. On the other hand, utilitarianism seems to offer a practical guideline for not only social policy makers but also for institutions, e.g. emergency room triage during disasters. Even as individuals, if we found our house burning with children and great grandpa inside, we’d first try to get the kids out. Therefore, despite its limitations and disturbing aspects, there seems to be am implicit utilitarian formula we follow under certain situations.
Finally, what about the needs of a minority in the face of doing what is best for the majority? This ends-justifies-the-means view of utilitarianism would seem to vindicate torture of a few if it revealed important information about saving scores or hundreds of others. If torture is justified in this situation, where can the limit be drawn?
In the end, we felt meeting and discussing this topic provided a deeper appreciation of utilitarianism’s practical advantages but disturbing implications and limitations. No one felt they would be able to hear the phrase “greatest good for the greatest number” in the same way again.
Join our discussions on the first and third Mondays of each month at 7 pm to critically examine ideas that make a difference.
Richard Bernstein

Primary Sidebar

Recent News

  • Society Gets Grant to Explore Concept of ‘Sacred Spaces’
  • Church-State Separation: Who Stands to Lose if the Wall Fails?
  • Two Grants Help Fund ‘Great NJ Science Show’
  • Meet Our Newest Members, Andy and Deborah Krikun
  • Struggle over Church-State Separation has Deep Roots in America

Sign up for our newsletter.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • YouTube

We believe in ethics. We believe in people.

Please believe in us.

Ethical Brew

Being White And Its Hidden Assumptions

‘How Race Impacts Conservation’

About Us

Ethical Culture was founded to focus on community and good works, rather than personal salvation. Read more…

Archives

Footer

Connect with Us

Address: 687 Larch Ave, Teaneck, NJ 07666
Phone: 201-836-5187
Email: [email protected]

Sign up for our newsletter.

 

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • YouTube

Recent Posts

  • Society Gets Grant to Explore Concept of ‘Sacred Spaces’ January 31, 2023
  • Church-State Separation: Who Stands to Lose if the Wall Fails? January 30, 2023
  • Two Grants Help Fund ‘Great NJ Science Show’ January 29, 2023
  • Meet Our Newest Members, Andy and Deborah Krikun January 29, 2023
  • Struggle over Church-State Separation has Deep Roots in America January 28, 2023

We believe in ethics. We believe in people.

Please believe in us.

Topics

atheism atheist church book review children church-state separation civil rights climate change community compassion death democracy Doris Friedensohn Elizabeth Warren environment Ethical Brew Ethical Culture ethical education ethics family Felix Adler gender global warming happiness healthcare humanism humanist humanists human rights Israel Joseph Chuman meetinghouse Middle East politics racism religion Robert Gulack Secular Humanism social action Socrates Cafe Sunday School technology Trump unemployment world health youth

What We Do For Fun….

There's always time for play: celebrations, discussions (some in Spanish -- find Conversemos on our calendar on the fourth Tuesday of the month), hikes, picnics, cultural outings, and more. Come join us!
Kids get into the act
Diane running the show

Important Links

  • Member of the American Ethical Union
  • Ethical Brew
  • Sanctuary Committee
  • BC Gun Violence Prevention
  • NJ Website Designer
© 2021 | The Ethical Culture Society of Bergen County NJ

Copyright © 2023 · Kreativ Pro On Genesis Framework · The Ethical Culture Society of Bergen County · Log in

  • Calendar of events
  • 687 Larch Av, Teaneck NJ
  • 201-836-5187
  • Contact Us
  • DONATE