• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Skip to footer navigation

  • Calendar of events
  • 687 Larch Av, Teaneck NJ
  • 201-836-5187
  • Contact Us
  • DONATE
Ethical Culture Society of Bergen County NJ

Ethical Culture Society of Bergen County NJ

  • Home
  • About
    • Platform
    • From our Society’s President, Susan Lesh
    • FAQ
      • How does Ethical Culture make a difference in society?
      • What social life is there in Ethical Culture?
      • How is Ethical Culture religious?
    • Ethical Brew
    • Ceremonies
    • Philosophy
    • Constitution & Bylaws
    • Our Building Calendar
    • Contact Us
  • Ethical Kids
    • Sunday School
      • Primary Class
      • Elementary Class
      • Junior Class
      • Senior Class
      • Sunday school FAQ
    • Youth Group
  • Leader
    • Interim Leader Curt Collier
    • Leader’s Talks
    • Joe Chuman, Retired Leader
      • Speaking of Ethics: Living a Humanist Life
      • Wedding Officiant
  • Social Action
    • All Social Action Articles
    • Battling Racism
    • Environmental Action
    • Healthcare
  • Adult Ed
    • Job Club
    • Socrates Cafe
    • Do Tell!
    • Ethical Culture Review of Books
  • News
    • President Column
    • UN Report
    • Platform Addresses
  • Events

Is Doing the Greatest Good for the Greatest Number the Right Thing?

April 12, 2012

A frosty but warm-hearted group gathered and decided to discuss if utilitarianism made sense. We began with a simple formulation of that ethical view, as mentioned in the title, but recognized that it could also be stated as doing the least harm or trying to do things that maximize the happiness or best consequences for those affected by one’s acts.
One of the first questions that arose was: who is in a position to make the decision of what is good or what happiness results from one’s actions? Even if one is trying to minimize suffering, rather than maximizing happiness, how can anyone be confident that he or she understand the variety of values and attitudes that others hold. While we may believe that pain and suffering should always be minimized, some belief such tribulations have redemptive value and would not want to avoid them.
The very idea of defining what is good for anyone else seems quite paternalistic. Like the Golden Rule, it assumes that what we would want for ourselves is a valid measuring stick to judge what we should do for others. Clearly this may not always be correct. We noted that Ethical Culture’s notion of identifying that which is special and worthy of development in others and thereby fostering our own moral development seems to avoid this paternalism.
Goods come in different flavors. Unconditional goods are those which one cannot have too much of, like health and justice. Most goods are conditional (e.g. money, relaxation, and freedom). But doing everything to maximize health of a society nonetheless will compromise other needs, and this too is not a realistic or even desirable goal.
We were concerned that utilitarianism seems to place values on people and would be willing to sacrifice handicapped newborns, since they would be a drain on social resources that could be put to alternative uses. Such a calculus seems to be operating in countries with national health systems, e.g. Britain, in which there is an age limit on providing dialysis machines. While this may be a reasonable, logical and “cost-effective” policy, it seems to run counter to our belief in the basic value and dignity of all humans, regardless of their age, physical and mental condition, or their capacity for productively contributing to society. Policy makers need to make disinterested decisions, but we, as family members, usually cannot. The cold, calculating aspect of utilitarianism seems to need an assertive counter-force to express compassion and respect for individuals. On the other hand, utilitarianism seems to offer a practical guideline for not only social policy makers but also for institutions, e.g. emergency room triage during disasters. Even as individuals, if we found our house burning with children and great grandpa inside, we’d first try to get the kids out. Therefore, despite its limitations and disturbing aspects, there seems to be am implicit utilitarian formula we follow under certain situations.
Finally, what about the needs of a minority in the face of doing what is best for the majority? This ends-justifies-the-means view of utilitarianism would seem to vindicate torture of a few if it revealed important information about saving scores or hundreds of others. If torture is justified in this situation, where can the limit be drawn?
In the end, we felt meeting and discussing this topic provided a deeper appreciation of utilitarianism’s practical advantages but disturbing implications and limitations. No one felt they would be able to hear the phrase “greatest good for the greatest number” in the same way again.
Join our discussions on the first and third Mondays of each month at 7 pm to critically examine ideas that make a difference.
Richard Bernstein

Primary Sidebar

Sign up for our newsletter.

Upcoming Events

Mon 19

Conversemos (Let’s Talk)

April 19 @ 7:30 pm - 9:00 pm
Fri 23

Mindfulness at Midday: Meditation, Movement, and Discussion Group

April 23 @ 12:00 pm - 1:30 pm
Sun 25

Platform: Growing Up and Healing the World

April 25 @ 11:00 am - 12:30 pm
Sun 25

Job Club Workshop

April 25 @ 2:00 pm - 3:00 pm
Mon 26

Socrates Cafe

April 26 @ 7:00 pm - 9:00 pm

View More…

Being White

Society asks Teaneck to Make BLM Mural Permanent

About Us

Ethical Culture was founded to focus on community and good works, rather than personal salvation. Read more…

We believe in ethics. We believe in people.

Please believe in us.

Ethical Brew

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • YouTube

Archives

Footer

Connect with Us

Address: 687 Larch Ave, Teaneck, NJ 07666
Phone: 201-836-5187
Email: admin@ethicalfocus.org

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • YouTube

Recent Posts

  • Earth Day 2021: A Great Day to Reconnect! April 18, 2021
  • Book Review: ‘The Earth is Weeping: The Epic Story of the Indian Wars for the American West’ April 7, 2021
  • At Online YES Conference, 28 Teens Discuss Education March 25, 2021
  • What is the Commemorative Fund Committee? March 25, 2021
  • It’s Spring! March 23, 2021

We believe in ethics. We believe in people.

Please believe in us.

Topics

atheism atheist church book review children civil rights climate change community compassion death democracy Doris Friedensohn Elizabeth Warren environment Ethical Brew Ethical Culture ethical dilemmas ethical education ethics everyday ethics Felix Adler global warming happiness healthcare humanism humanist humanists human rights Israel Joseph Chuman meetinghouse Middle East politics racism religion Robert Gulack Secular Humanism social action Socrates Cafe Sunday School Susan Golden technology Trump unemployment winter solstice world health

What We Do For Fun….

There's always time for play: celebrations, discussions (some in Spanish -- find Conversemos on our calendar on the fourth Tuesday of the month), hikes, picnics, cultural outings, and affinity groups like our monthly Men's Dinners and Women's Dinners.
Kids get into the act
Diane running the show

Important Links

  • Member of the American Ethical Union
  • Ethical Brew
  • Sanctuary Committee
  • BC Gun Violence Prevention
  • NJ Website Designer
© 2021 | The Ethical Culture Society of Bergen County NJ

Copyright © 2021 · Kreativ Pro On Genesis Framework · The Ethical Culture Society of Bergen County · Log in

  • Calendar of events
  • 687 Larch Av, Teaneck NJ
  • 201-836-5187
  • Contact Us
  • DONATE